How To Make Your Case Studies Count!
from
the June 2004 issue
This
issue, in addition to clarifying the number and types of cases
which are now required, will take a look at some of the common
problem areas and costly mistakes which can lead to application
delays.
1.
Cases For Review
Aortic
stenosis case. This type of study allows reviewers to accurately
assess both the sonographer's ability to perform 2-D images
and spectral Doppler for adequate valve interrogation as well
as the abilities of the interpreting physician.
Left
ventricular dysfunction case. This type of study allows
reviewers to evaluate the interpreting physician's ability to
recognize and report wall motion abnormalities of the left ventricle.
This study should be a regional wall motion abnormality and
not a global cardiomyopathy. Global cardiomyopathy studies impede
the reviewer's assessment of the physician's interpretation
skills.
2.
Details, Details: An Application Checklist
For Technical Directors and Laboratory Staff
Before
sending your application, ensure that each case study complies
with the checklist below. A large percentage of applications
are returned or delayed because one or more of these issues
are not addressed.
a)
Each testing section is on its own tape or CD, and is labeled
with:
1)
the patient's name,
2)
the type of pathology (AS or LVDF),
3)
the name of the sonographer performing the study, and
4)
the name of the interpreting physician.
(Please
do not send testing sections (i.e., TTE, TEE, Stress) on the
same tape or CD, since each reviewer may not be reviewing
all sections of your application.)
b)
All cases are abnormal and represent the work of as many staff
members as possible.
c)
All transthoracic representative cases show all the
necessary ICAEL details of the cardiac anatomy and are visualized
adequately.
It
is understood that technical limitations will occasionally
limit the sonographer's ability to adequately define cardiac
structures and visualize myocardium when performing transthoracic
echocardiograms. However, the representative transthoracic
cases submitted for review should demonstrate all appropriate
views of above-average examination quality. This is an opportunity
to demonstrate your best work. Technically
limited cases should not be submitted for review.
d)
All cases are submitted in duplicate. Your application will
be reviewed by two (2) independent reviewers, and each will
require a copy.
e)
All left ventricular dysfunction (LVDF) cases are regional
wall motion abnormalities and not global cardiomyopathy.
f)
All cases represent the laboratory's best work.
The purpose of reviewing representative cases is to evaluate
the interpretative and technical quality of the laboratory
as a whole. Because this aspect of the application carries
a significant weight of the final decision, extreme care should
be used in selecting only the laboratory's best work.
|
|
ICAEL
CASE STUDY REQUIREMENTS
|
|
Adult
Transthoracic Cases:
|
|
1
to 3 staff =
|
4
cases per lab (2 AS, 2 LVDF)
|
|
4
to 8 staff =
|
6
cases per lab (3 AS, 3 LVDF)
|
|
9
to 15 staff =
|
8
cases per lab (4 AS, 4 LVDF)
|
|
16
to 25 staff =
|
10
cases per lab (5 AS, 5 LVDF)
|
|
>25
staff =
|
12
cases per lab (6 AS, 6 LVDF)
|
| Adult
Transesophageal Cases: |
| 1
case per physician that includes an indication or
finding of a greater than mild mitral regurgitation
or source of emboli. |
| Adult
Stress Cases: |
|
1
to 3 staff =
4 to 8 staff =
9 to 15 staff =
16 to 25 staff =
>25 staff =
|
4
cases per lab
6 cases per lab
8 cases per lab
10 cases per lab
12 cases per lab
|
| Multiple
Site Cases: |
2
Adult Transthoracic cases (1 AS and 1 LVDF)
2 Adult Abnormal Stress cases |
| Pediatric
Transthoracic Cases: |
|
1
to 3 staff =
|
4
cases per lab (2 shunts, 1 simple obstruction, 1
complex defect)
|
|
4
to 8 staff =
|
6
cases per lab (2 shunts, 2 simple obstructions,
2 complex defects)
|
|
9
to 15 staff =
|
8
cases per lab (4 shunts, 2 simple obstructions,
2 complex defects)
|
|
16
to 25 staff =
|
10
cases per lab (4 shunts, 3 simple obstructions,
3 complex defects)
|
|
>25
staff =
|
12
cases per lab (4 shunts, 4 simple obstructions,
4 complex defects)
|
| Pediatric
Transesophageal Cases: |
| 1
case per physician that includes a complete examination
including (but not limited to) all of the views listed
in the Essentials and Standards. |
| Fetal
Cases: |
| 2
cases per physician with at least 1 representative
case of fetal arrhythmia and 1 case of hypoplastic
ventricle that is a complete examination. |
| Pediatric
Multiple Site Cases: |
2
pediatric transthoracic cases (1 shunt or 1 simple
obstruction and 1 complex defect)
1 pediatric transesophageal case per physician that
includes a complete examination including (but not
limited to) all of the views listed in the Essentials
and Standards
2 fetal cases per physician with at least 1 representative
case of fetal arrhythmia and 1 case of hypoplastic
ventricle that is a complete examination by physicians
not rotating through the main site |
|
|
3.
Case Study Sample Scenarios
The
ICAEL recognizes that since staff size varies, the number of
case studies required is dependent upon the number of medical
and technical staff per lab. To the left is a table of the current
requirements -- the types of studies and the staff representation
reviewers will be looking for in your application. Also included
are some scenarios for both adequate and inadequate case study
representations, which might help clarify the requirements as
you prepare your own application.
ADEQUATE
CASE STUDY REPRESENTATION:
Example
1: A laboratory with four reading physicians and two
sonographers (totaling six staff members) is required to submit
six case studies. Every reading physician and every sonographer
must be represented in at least one case study.
Example
2: A laboratory with nine reading physicians and six
sonographers (totaling fifteen staff members) must submit eight
case studies. In this scenario, every sonographer must be represented
by at least one case study, and some will be represented by
two studies. However, one physician will not be represented
among the eight case studies. The ninth physician is the only
staff member excluded from submitted case studies, but since
it is impossible to represent nine physicians with eight studies,
the requirement is fulfilled.
Example
3: A laboratory with 24 reading physicians and 14 sonographers
(totaling 38 staff members) must submit 12 case studies. The
combination of case studies must represent 12 different physicians
and 12 different sonographers. No sonographer or physician can
be represented more than once. As a result, 12 physicians and
two sonographers will not be included among the submitted case
studies.
INADEQUATE
CASE STUDY REPRESENTATION:
Example
1: A laboratory with 12 reading physicians and four
sonographers (totaling 16 staff members) is required to submit
10 case studies. Let us assume that the cases submitted represent
ten of the 12 physicians on staff, and three of the four sonographers.
Accreditation would be delayed in order to review at least 2
cases from the sonographer not represented.
Example
2: A laboratory with 17 reading physicians and 8 sonographers
(totaling 25 staff members) must submit 12 case studies. Again,
let us assume that those cases represent 12 different members
of the medical staff. If the Technical Director is represented
in six of those cases and six of the remaining sonographers
are each represented by a case, only seven of the eight technical
staff members would be represented. Accreditation would be delayed.
Example
3: A laboratory with 8 physicians and 2 sonographers
(totaling 10 staff members) is required to submit 6 case studies.
If physicians submit two cases each, while technologists submit
three cases apiece, only three physicians will be represented
in the case studies. To fulfill the requirement, six of the
eight physicians must be represented along with both sonographers.
Accreditation of this laboratory would be delayed.
|
|
In
Summary
The
size of your laboratory's staff determines how many cases your
laboratory must submit, and those guidelines are contained in
the ICAEL Application For Accreditation. Because the revised
application requires fewer cases, the larger your laboratory,
the less likely it is that each member will be represented.
However, the cases must always include as many medical and staff
members as possible, and no medical or technical staff member
should be represented more than once if any other member of
his or her respective department has been excluded.
Please
feel free to contact the ICAEL office by phone, at 410-872-0100,
or email Cassie Robbins, RDCS, FASE, Technical Manager, at robbins@intersocietal.org,
if you would like to discuss any specifics related to your laboratory's
application.
|